This site is intended for healthcare professionals only
59TH ERA CONGRESS: Independent symposium webcast
Chaired by Claire Sharpe with Pantelis Sarafidis, David Thomas & Ellen Hoogeveen
PARTICIPANT’S EVALUATION FORM
We value your opinion: please complete the evaluation form and provide your information to receive your CME credits.
Title
*
First name
*
Last name
*
Quality of the symposium
1. How useful for your professional activity did you find this webcast?
*
Extremely useful
Useful
Fairly useful
Not useful
2. What was your overall impression of this webcast?
*
Program
Excellent
Good
Fairly good
Poor
Very poor
What was your overall impression of this symposium?
*
Organization
Excellent
Good
Fairly good
Poor
Very poor
What did you like best about the webcast or was most beneficial to you?
Was there any aspect of the webcast that you feel should be improved or was least beneficial to you?
Relevance of the symposium
3. Did the webcast fulfil your educational goals and expected learning outcomes?
*
Interpret K+ concentration alongside other patient risk- and clinical-based measures to inform hyperkalemia management and monitoring
Very much
Somewhat
Not much
Not at all
Undecided
Did the symposium fulfil your educational goals and expected learning outcomes?
*
Utilize the emerging evidence and guidelines for the optimization of RAASi therapy when risk of hyperkalemia is high
Very much
Somewhat
Not much
Not at all
Undecided
Did the symposium fulfil your educational goals and expected learning outcomes?
*
Explain the role of newer K+ binders in the management of hyperkalemia whilst maintaining cardio-renal protection
Very much
Somewhat
Not much
Not at all
Undecided
4. Was the presented information well balanced and consistently supported by a valid scientific evidence base?
*
Very much
Somewhat
Not much
Not at all
Undecided
5. How useful to you personally was each session?
*
Balancing cardio-renal protection and hyperkalemia risk in CKD
Extremely useful
Useful
Fairly useful
Not useful
Undecided
How useful to you personally was each session?
*
Hyperkalemia inpatient management and post-discharge: when should we use K+ binders?
Extremely useful
Useful
Fairly useful
Not useful
Undecided
How useful to you personally was each session?
*
How can we reduce the burden of hyperkalemia?
Extremely useful
Useful
Fairly useful
Not useful
Undecided
Suitability of formats used during the symposium
6. Was there adequate time available for questions & answers and learner engagement?
Yes, always/almost always
Yes, sometimes
Only rarely
Never
Undecided
Ways the symposium affects clinical practice
6. As a result of watching this webcast, will you make any measurable changes in your role?
*
Yes
Possibly, after additional training
No, but the content affirms my current daily practice
No, I’m unable to implement the information
Undecided
Can you provide ONE example how this webcast will influence your future practice?
What are the barriers that prevent you from making changes?
Commercial bias
7. Did all the faculty members provide their potential conflict of interest declarations in their presentations?
*
Yes, all
Yes, for the majority
Yes, but only a small part
No
Undecided/don’t know
8. Do you agree that the information was overall free of commercial and other bias?
*
Strongly agree
Rather agree
Rather disagree
Strongly disagree
Undecided/don’t know
Can you provide an example of biased presentation in this activity?
Final comments
9. Would you recommend this webcast to your colleagues?
*
Yes
No
10. Do you have any final questions or comments?
Phone
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
